As WWII progressed, so too did the death toll. Whereas in normal times all families would be able to place death notices in the local paper, with the increase in demand for notices, it became more difficult to obtain a mention. At the beginning of the war, the wording of the notices was chosen by the bereaving family, and usually mentioned overt support of Hitler and the Nazi state. As conditions in the mid-1940s worsened, and the war effort became rougher, this support began to falter and families began to draw back on it because more and more notices were placed, more and more family members and friends died, and the progress of the Nazi army seemed to stagnate. Typically, the Nazi government wanted to control this slipping of support for the regime. As it did with almost every other sector of civilian life, the government began to restrict the wording allowed on death notices and even mandate what was said. To avoid having a version of “for the Fatherland” written, disregarding any mention of the Furher, in 1944 the phrase “Für Fürher, Volk und Reich” was mandatory to anyone wishing to place a death notice. I’m sure that this mandated saying also frustrated those wishing to place a death notice, as they would have wanted their memorial to be personalized. From the death notice regulations you can see the true circumstances leading into the last year of the war: The death toll was rising, and Nazi support was slipping.
Rachel brought up the important point that support for the Nazi party was slipping as the war ranged across Europe. Not only popular support was diminishing but a rebellion rose within the Nazi party. German army officers Friedrich Olbricht, Henning von Tresckow, and Claus von Stauffenberg were the leaders of the July 20 plot or better known as ‘Operation Valkyrie’. They intended to modify preexisting Nazi plans to dismantle the SS, take control of Germany, and detain Nazi leadership once Hitler had been assassinated. They believed that to release German soldiers from the bond they had to the Chancellor, Hitler’s death was necessary. The plot was set in motion in 1944 but failed, despite their lengthy preparation.
The Wolfsschanze after the bomb
This act of treason against the party demonstrated how discontent was widespread amongst the German population and the incoming demise of the Nazi party.
I can’t seem to post the picture, so here is the link to it
http://www.endstation-rechts.de/uploads/pics/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1972-025-10__Hitler-Attentat__20._Juli_1944.jpg